Userbenchmark Recenzje 902

i personally love User Benchmark for its generally sound comparisons however it is quite annoying that it shows the original price instead ofthe market value, and i wish the original description was amended for the current value (second hand)

It's mid-2025, and CPUPro/GPUPro (the site's reviewer) still hates AMD...

Why bother reviewing if you're doing it through biased lenses every time? Why can't you admit when a product is good instead of slandering it? What do you get out of it? Do you invest in Intel stock? Do you want to see AMD fail despite their massive gains in market share and public perception that are well-deserved? Intel is great at making processors, fine. Nvidia makes good gaming GPUs, sure. That doesn't mean everything else is bad.

Great website, free product that allows you to compare and contrast brands and prices without any ulterior motives. Put together a great PC and I'm typing this review on it now!

The benchmarks on this website are extremely biased against AMD.

Wanted to see the spec differences between two Intel laptop CPUs from the same generation side-by-side, and ended up on this site. Between the core count and clockspeed they wedged some links to a FAQ about how everyone is being so unfair to them and how they've only got a poor reputation because they refuse to be bought... followed by article after article of blatant shilling for Intel while trashing every single AMD product. They directly attack other reviewers who disagree with them BY NAME. Many Intel and Nvidia products lack descriptions/summaries, but almost all AMD products have one that makes a ton of poorly backed accusations combined with some jab that if anyone says anything positive it can only be because they're an undercover marketing agent. At first glance this site looks like it offers useful information, but that only makes it worse that when you dig into it it's bad to the point of being a farce.

Horribly biased against AMD graphics cards and cpus; saying that AMD is worse than the NVIDIA or Intel equivalent despite the fact that the AMD equivalent can be objectively better than the competitor's option.

gooooooooooooooooood

For the price, they cant be beat. I know of no other source to use for benchmarks and testing besides Passmark. Passmark seems a bit outdated since they show 4070 ti beating a 7900XTX, which does not hold up to real world data as found by Techpowerup.com benchmarks for real games. The only annoying thing about Userbenchmark is that it does not remember my login credentials so I need to relogin every time I open it. Also, cloud support is non-existent. Benchmarks are only saved locally for your account. Also no annoying ads anymore. Thank u!

Dont trust userbenchmark with any benchmarks because they only promote nvidia and intel even tough its generally known now that amd cpus are alot better than intels in every category. And they always claim nvidias gpus are better price per performance even though its known AMD is alot better for price per performance compared to nvidia. They also say that the intel b580 is worse than the 4060 even if thats obviously untrue. Look at any benchmark and see that the b580 is better than the 4060. Userbenchmark is untrustworthy NEVER USE IT.

JOO BACKED. JOO FUNNY.
J oO shyt mark. Intel, JoO. Who knew. No one got a clue.
User shyt mark got no friend in You.

Its hilarious at this point just grab some snacks and see his ass on fire about amd

Blatantly Biased. Criticises marketing while trying their best to promote intel. Since 2019 they have thrown tantrums about AMD.

I would only use this for comparisons of the same brand. They are extremely biased against AMD going back to 2017. If I tested a processor that was similar among both brands, userbenchmark would twist it from "The AMD (equivalent) processor crashed once whilst I was messing with drivers" to "The AMD processor crashed often and thats why its worse than intel." Thats not a "for consumer" thats predatory.

wow, just wow this is the most amd hating nvidia fanboying website ever, not only is it biased towards nvidia/intel, but they try and play it off as this site just being bs, they are paid to do this stuff, so this just sucks.

They just flame AMD for no reason and a few accounts ( whose names are a piece of hardware followed by the word pro) probably owned by the owner who make the descriptions. Userbenchmark calls people hating them "virgins" as if it'll do anything other than make a fun pastime to make fun of this website. Whoever made that roast has the mentality of a Stereotypical high school bully.The benchmarks aren't accurate either as it says the core 9 Utra 285 has faster core speeds as they cherry picked the performance cores being used even though these cores hardly get used outside gaming and productivity.

Seriously biased benchmarks against AMD across the board. And if a quantitative analysis doesn't explain it, take a look at their prose: "The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands. " This is clearly juvenile and ad hominem fallicies wrapped under a website pretending to have a modicum of honesty. I'd be extremely surprised if this website wasn't run by Intel marketers: "Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. " This isn't respectable in the slightest, and anyone looking to properly compare and/or test hardware should stay far away, instead going to independent testers and websites.

Ridiculously biased and unreliable reviews that are not to be taken seriously. I'd even take it as far to say they are probably secretly sponsored by Intel with their absurd comparisons and verdicts. People can love and hate certain brands in the computing industry, but their seething hatred for AMD is either satirical or a result of generous pay from AMD rivals.