Hazard perception videos are a joke. Really low quality videos, pixilated and really demotivating when you get a video wrong not through your fault but because you can't make anything out. In add... Zobacz więcej
Chociaż nie weryfikujemy konkretnych wypowiedzi, ponieważ opinie recenzentów są ich własnymi opiniami, recenzje mogą zostać oznaczone jako „Zweryfikowane”, jeśli uda nam się potwierdzić, że doszło do rzeczywistej interakcji biznesowej. Dowiedz się więcej
Aby chronić integralność platformy, każda recenzja na naszej platformie—zweryfikowana lub nie—jest sprawdzana przez nasze oprogramowanie działające w trybie 24/7. Technologia ta została zaprojektowana w celu identyfikowania i usuwania treści, które naruszają nasze wytyczne, w tym recenzji, które nie opierają się na prawdziwym doświadczeniu. Zdajemy sobie sprawę, że możemy nie wychwycić wszystkiego, dlatego możesz oflagować wszystko, co według Ciebie mogliśmy przeoczyć. Dowiedz się więcej
Zobacz, co mówią recenzenci
I’m finding the theory questions on Safer Driving for Life perfectly fine, but the hazard perception videos are a completely different story. The quality of the videos, especially consider... Zobacz więcej
Advertises as having 130+ hazard perception videos, however in the mock tests, I've probably had no more than the same 25 on rotation. There only seems to be one of the 2 hazard clips. Not great pract... Zobacz więcej
This site seems reasonable to me, the purchase went through fine and the training material seems pretty good, although the video clip quality is quite low. I don't understand why so many people thin... Zobacz więcej
Informacje dotyczące firmy
Informacje przekazane przez różne źródła zewnętrzne
Whatever you're learning to drive, safedrivingforlife.info contains handy tools and advice to help you prepare for your theory and practical tests and beyond.
Dane kontaktowe
Croydon Street, BS5 0DA, Bristol, Zjednoczone Królestwo
- www.safedrivingforlife.info
Brak historii zapraszania do wystawiania recenzji
Ta firma nie zaprosiła klientów do recenzowania, dlatego recenzje mogą nie być w pełni reprezentatywne
Jak firma korzysta z Trustpilot
Dowiedz się, w jaki sposób pozyskiwane, oceniane i moderowane są ich recenzje i oceny.
The hazard perception videos are very poor quality and set you up to fail
I’m finding the theory questions on Safer Driving for Life perfectly fine, but the hazard perception videos are a completely different story.
The quality of the videos, especially considering it’s 2026, is absolutely appalling. They are extremely low quality, and on many of them, by the time you can actually see the hazard clearly enough to identify and click on it, it'S already too late. The result is a low mark or, in some cases, no score at all.
Hazard perception should test your ability to recognise developing hazards, not your ability to spot something that is barely visible in a poor quality video before the scoring window has effectively passed.
I have been in touch with the company about this, because I genuinely think the quality and timing of these videos need to be reviewed and improved.
The theory questions are perfectly reasonable, but the hazard perception section feels unnecessarily difficult because of the quality of the material rather than the difficulty of the actual test.
For something designed to prepare people for their theory test, the standard of these videos is simply not good enough.
Hazard perception videos are a joke
Hazard perception videos are a joke. Really low quality videos, pixilated and really demotivating when you get a video wrong not through your fault but because you can't make anything out.
In addition the actual theory is presented in such an ineffective way, like it's a corporate training website.
Stick to a different app like Theory Test 4 in 1.
This desperately needs updating
This desperately needs updating. I used it a few years ago and just scraped by. However my wife used it just recently and most questions and hazard perception videos weren't anything like what came up on her actual theory test.
Very very useless company outdated case…
Very very useless company outdated case study wasted my time and money. Please stay away from this site if you looking to pass your case study for lgv and CPC because none of the questions will come up not even single one, failed my case study most 36 out of 50 needed 40 to pass, most of the questions were common sense to my surprised none of the questions I studied came up. Scam I'm fuming. I wasted 20 pounds on lgv and CPC cases study
Not providing what is advertised
Advertises as having 130+ hazard perception videos, however in the mock tests, I've probably had no more than the same 25 on rotation. There only seems to be one of the 2 hazard clips. Not great practicing when you've seen the scenario before as you stop paying attention as you know the hazard isn't yet
Worst revision book
Worst revision book. Outdated questions. Hazard videos also outdated. Do not buy
Smashed my LGV theory using this…
Smashed my LGV theory only using this for revision, provides a solid breadth of the questions you’ll be asked in the real thing and the hazard perception practice was a good refresher on when to click, obviously there will be a few questions that will be new to you in the real test but that’s expected.
App is ok for multiple choices…
App is ok for multiple choices questions. Hazarad perception clips are repeated top often. The cpc case studies was the worst they were alot more difficult and in detail on the actual test..for the money definitely not worth it
This e learning really works
I completed all of the training for both Theory and Hazard Perception. Then I did 8 mock tests for each subject and passed the real tests with high marks.
This is a scam in my opinion
This is a scam in my opinion. And must be avoided.
Failed 1st with this. Passed 2nd with other app.
I purchased the 30 day pack 2 weeks before my test. Spent several hours on it every day. Questions I kept scoring between 47-50 on mocks and hazards I was getting 60-67. So both passes in terms of a test. Felt very confident but then found that the driving theory 4in1 app is way better. On here, the hazard videos are repetitive so it is less about learning when to click and more about doing it because you know it’s when you need too. The questions too, they missed loads out on this.
After feeling confident because of this purchase with safer driving for life and passing mocks with flying colours - I was gutted to come out of the actual test with a 42/50 on the questions and 57/75 on hazards. So I failed first time. Retook a week later with the 4in1 app and passed.
I’d get the theory 4 in 1 app over this. It’s £5 and in my real test they used 2 videos which were shown on this app.
I will say that the questions in the real test are hard. Pay attention to the wording as they can be completely different. They will always throw 3 questions in which you don’t know / wouldn’t have seen on any app.
Multiple Choice Questions seem ok
Multiple Choice Questions seem ok , but there are not enough different Hazard Perception Clips it just repeats the same ones which is completely useless.
Worst thing is this is endorsed by the dvsa because I clicked the link when I booked my Theory Test so now I will have to go and fork out more money to or a Better site. Avoid
Terrible for hazard perception
The multiple choice side of things are great but do not use the hazard perception to study for your real test. This site claims to mimic the real test environment but in reality it’s completely different. I was passing all my hazard perception tests and 100% test ready according to this app. However, I failed this part of my test and the experience, the number of allowed clicks etc is nothing like this app. I feel a bit cheated as they claim to mirror the real life test.
the website is absolutely shocking
Honestly the website is absolutely shocking.
Videos don’t play, it took about 10
Attempts to even set up the login. Pop up windows about cookies keep appearing and disappearing. It’s absolutely terrible
The little things
Typically a lot of the material doesn't cover large portions of basic aspects about the vehicle type in question, used this site for both my motorcycle and lorry just to find multiple things that are in the tests but not covered by the material in any aspect. When a person has to use other learning material to compensate for the holes in yours, then you have failed to make a reliable source of information.
The website is easy to access and while there are big holes in its knowledge-base the information provided is accurate and reliable.
Practice Makes Perfect
I used this website and the Highway Code for my revision and mok tests. I used both for over an hour each day for 1 month and today I passed my theory 50/50 and smashed the hazard perception. I know fine well that if i did not combine the 2 I would not have passed.
Please bare in mind that the website is not cheat sheet for the test, you do need to study, but if you combine both you can pass..
I honestly think this might be a scam…
I honestly think this might be a scam company rather than TSO/DVSA. I paid £20 for 3 month gift subscription on 28 Nov. The email never arrived in daughter's inbox & nobody responds to emails to chase.
I can log into my account and see the purchase, but there is no way to check progress/cancel.
Adds !!!
I bought a motorbike course, adds keep pops up when you answer questions!!!! it feels like spam emails
No validation…email
Numerous calls to receive validation email without success
Probably a scam
Doświadczenie Trustpilot
Każdy może napisać recenzję na Trustpilot. Osoby, które wystawiają opinie, mają prawo do ich edytowania lub usuwania w dowolnym momencie. Będą one wyświetlane, dopóki aktywne jest konto.
Wykorzystujemy wiedzę odpowiednio wykwalifikowanych pracowników oraz sprytną technologię, aby chronić naszą platformę. Dowiedz się, jak zwalczamy fałszywe recenzje.
Dowiedz się więcej o procesie recenzji Trustpilot.
Weryfikacja może pomóc zapewnić, że recenzje, które czytasz na Trustpilot są napisane przez prawdziwych ludzi.
Oferowanie zachęt w zamian za pisanie recenzji lub wysyłanie próśb o ich wystawienie w sposób selektywny może wpłynąć na TrustScore, co jest sprzeczne z naszymi wytycznymi.








