Wirestock Recenzje 

It's really very good; they always quickly resolve any questions I have, the support is excellent. I've already done work for the platform and it was great, truly excellent.

wirestock is too good to manage my content to submitting in various marketplaces at once. it saves me lot of time and efforts.

Can't cash out; the website keeps finding ways to take your money.

Wirestock paid project has helped me earn money by giving projects that is doable.

I like how the process is easy, but at the same time some reviews aren't that specific or helpful for the editor so it's alittle bit mysterious and take alot of time to be approved
the payment is good but should be more with time specially for old people who works from the beginning and have good sets.

Payments clear, supports helpful—everything you need and expect.

Photography, video, and AI contests are very interesting, as are projects that offer earnings, but the photo review and automatic rejection is very bad.

The IA challenges are very nice to participate.

Everything is easy at Wirestock. I'm happy to work with Wirestock.

Everything is good but project consistency is not. If projects are consistent it’s fine to work for them.

As a contributor there are many issues that we find frustrating, like:
- the core business of paying to contribute to agencies, ( like somebody ask money to get a job, similar situation )
- when there are bonus or datasaset payments on each agency , sometimes every month ( shutterstock ) or twice or more a year ( getty, deposit, adobe, pond5 etc ) , we never got any extra payment for our assets ( so it means that they get the money keep it ),
-missions are very bad organized and paid a lot less than in adobe/getty, and the communication in general is very unpolite.

Its a very bad rated distributor in the world of stock contributors and artists, look in you tube ( not the sponsored by them of course ) and in forums and you will find more answers.

Ok I’ve been with wirestock since 2021 and it was free to submit photos and videos back then and I have sold a few photos and videos, which was excellent, but when you ask for money now to submit 200 photos and videos a month that’s fine but it should be 200 submited approved photos and videos per month for market place, I just don’t like submitting 200 photos and Videos and 100 of them only get approved it would be good if you could give us back those 100 that wasn’t approved to make up it up to the 200 we were paying for the month as a lot of us photographers have 10 of thousands photos ready to go up

I had an issue with my payout, and Ike was incredibly helpful throughout the process. He responded quickly, guided me step by step, and made sure everything was resolved smoothly. His professionalism, clear communication, and kindness really stood out.

Thank you so much, Ike, for your excellent support, I truly appreciate your help!

I'm purchasing a one year premium membership plane but it can't work. After contacting the support team, he asked to wait 24 hours and it will be updated. But I'm waiting 4 days it's not working properly. I'm sending an email about my issue support team not responding.

Every time I select an external marketplace it's repeating to buy a premium membership? How many times do I purchase?

Support team response within 24 hours before payment after payment they are not responding more than 3 Days

After the payment I saw overall review in DISCORD members/customers everyone facing issues

Customer service not responding everyone

Does anyone know about this?

The customer support is very good. The best thing I can say is the speed and simplicity of the explanations, which are clear.

Lol, this is just a clever scam concept—nothing more.
They’ve found a way to rip off photographers in a “legal” way.
Just stay away from them; they’re shady.

All of sudden, this month my sales and earnings decreased by 90-95%..
How can from 1-2 video sales for a day to 0 sales in 22 days?

It clearly shows they are not updating sales and stealing money from contributors...

edit1 (29th July 2025):
Adobe stock earnings updates daily, and this month no sales update after 1st July...and no sales update from all agencies after 16th July 2025...and you saying this is normal?

and as I said Its clear that my sales and earnings decreased by 90-95%...

Usually I earn at least $50 a month...and sometimes more than $100 a month...
this month I earned only $5...

and I mailed Wirestock support, earnings graph for months from more than 2 years...and asked if that looks normal by comparing with this months earnings with previous months earnings??
and no response....

Title:
Avoid This Platform – Mass Denials, No Refunds, Buggy

Review:
I want to share my honest experience with Wirestock, and I strongly recommend avoiding this platform at all costs.

From the very beginning, the site was buggy — with technical issues, upload errors, and painfully slow loading times. While that was eventually fixed, the real problems started after.

The Main Issue: Biased and Inconsistent Review Process

Wirestock’s content review process feels completely subjective, almost like it depends on the reviewer’s mood that day — something I initially thought was an exaggeration until I experienced it myself. I regularly submit the same photos to Adobe Stock and Shutterstock with no issues, and they’re approved without hesitation. Yet, those same images get denied in batches on Wirestock — often with vague reasons or none at all.

It got worse after I reached out to support with polite, fair questions. Suddenly, I started getting mass denials while I was watching it happen live. No photo-by-photo inspection, no explanation — just blanket rejections. And these weren’t low-effort images. Many had been checked through AI tools like ChatGPT for technical quality. Feedback like “beautiful lighting, no technical flaws, stock-eligible” — yet still denied here.

Submissions Count Against Your Limit — Even When Denied

What makes it worse is that every submission counts toward your monthly limit — even the ones they reject. So if you upload 100 carefully edited photos and they approve just 2, you’re still locked out of uploading more that month. You can’t even retry those images without burning through your quota again.

Paid Subscription With No Refunds

I regret trusting their advertising and paying for a full year. They do not offer refunds. I kept trying to upload in hopes of salvaging some value from the subscription, but the rejection rate only increased. Ironically, some of the same images have already sold on other stock platforms and as prints — so the issue clearly isn’t the quality of the work.

Broken AI Tools and Empty Promises

They heavily promote their built-in AI tools, but even those can’t produce images that pass their own standards. Support admitted this. So what’s the point?

The Only Positive

One support rep tried to be helpful and answered my emails respectfully. Unfortunately, that’s not enough to make up for a deeply flawed system and unfair policies.
Final Warning:

No transparency, broken AI features, and inconsistent image reviews. I’ll be making a full video breakdown of my experience with screenshots, Diving into the Lightroom RAWs and my edits, email history, and comparisons to approvals on other platforms — just to show how unreasonable this system has become. It's easier for people to see it with video proof.

Please save your time and money. Wirestock is not worth it.

REPLY TO YOUR ANSWER:

If you’re saying that giving detailed reasons for rejections just means copy-pasting this vague sentence:

“Noise /Artifacts / Film Grain: Image contains excessive noise, film grain, compression artifacts, and/or posterization.”

—then that’s simply not acceptable or accurate.

Some of my best-selling images on other platforms have been rejected here after I left a negative review. Suddenly, everything gets denied with the same generic reason, while your responses remain overly polite and non-specific to try to look good on trustpilot.

Here’s what an actual technical breakdown of the image says (from professional-level AI analysis):
• Sharpness: Very good across the entire frame. No noticeable motion blur or softness.
• Focus: Crisp from foreground boats to background hills. Excellent depth.
• Exposure: Well-balanced, no blown-out highlights or underexposed shadows.
• Color & White Balance: Natural, vibrant, and accurate.
• Noise & Artifacts: Virtually none, even in shadows. No visible chromatic aberration or compression issues.

So why exactly are these images being denied?

I’ve also reached out via email asking how I could improve or adapt my workflow to your platform, and I haven’t received a single helpful or specific answer. I genuinely want to improve based on your requirements—but that requires real feedback, not auto-generated copy-paste responses.

Since I’ve paid for a full year, I’ll continue uploading content and documenting every rejection, email, and response as part of an honest, user-based comparison of stock sites. This will include screenshots and a detailed breakdown in a review or video about what platforms are worth using—and which ones to avoid. I mean you even take your fair share of the sales, what you guys do doesn't really make sense.

Latest Edit: They offered a refund for the premium plan so only paid for normal! Supportperson is still good!

I subscribed to Wirestock hoping it would streamline the process of submitting my photos to multiple stock marketplaces. Unfortunately, the experience has been deeply disappointing.

All of my photo submissions were rejected on Wirestock—often with identical rejection reasons across entire sets. Yet, many of these exact same photos were accepted when I submitted them manually to the very platforms Wirestock claims to distribute to (like Adobe Stock, Dreamstime, etc.). That really made me question the value and reliability of their review process.

I reached out to request a refund for the annual subscription, explaining that the service had provided no benefit. Despite the fact that I had not been able to use the platform effectively and received zero accepted submissions, my request was declined.

I cannot recommend this service, especially to photographers who are looking for real support or results. You're better off submitting directly to the platforms yourself.

No entendia muy bien algunos de los conceptos del modelo W-8BEN. Despues de contactar via email, me lo aclararon sin problema, con una amable atención.