I've been trading with My Crypto Funding since the end of last year. The rules are clear and consistent, they don't change, they have friendly support on Discord, and the trading platform is easy.
Thank you Dennis & Liam for your kind and quick response.

Twitter da kötü yorum okuyorum sürekli bu firma hakkında dikkatli olmakta fayda var!

çok kişi ödeme alamıyor dikkatli olun firmadan uzak durun paranızı bu firamaya heba etmeyin lütfen

Great experience with this crypto funding platform so far. The rules are clear, execution is smooth, and the overall system feels trader-friendly. Big shoutout to Maxx, Adenzo, and Liam for being professional and supportive—they actually respond and help when needed, which is rare in this space. Payout process and dashboard feel well-structured. Overall, a solid option for serious traders looking for funding without unnecessary drama.

I am writing this review to share my experience with My Crypto Funding (MCF) and to inform other traders.

After successfully passing the evaluation, I was given a funded account that was already restricted with a 1% risk limit from the very beginning. In other words, my funded account was delivered to me with this limitation already in place.

I traded in compliance with the rules, generated profits, and submitted a $6,200 payout request. On the same day I requested the payout, my account was suddenly placed under review and then closed. It was only at that point that MCF claimed I had exceeded the 1% risk limit — without having previously provided any formal or clear justification.

Initially, MCF accused me of “deliberate circumvention” of the 1% risk rule. After I formally objected, MCF withdrew this accusation, explicitly acknowledging that there was no bad faith, no intent, and no deliberate rule violation on my part. They also admitted that their communication regarding the 1% risk framework was unclear and could reasonably lead to misunderstanding.

Despite these admissions, my earned funded profits of $6,200 were not paid. Instead, MCF offered to reset my account back to Phase 1, which would result in all profits being forfeited.

Key facts:
• My funded account was restricted with a 1% risk limit from the start
• The 1% risk limit was not exceeded at the time trades were opened
• No automatic system breach or hard block ever occurred
• MCF acknowledged there was no intentional rule violation
• The alleged “risk breach” was raised only on the day I requested my payout

Withholding a trader’s earned profits while admitting unclear communication and lack of intent is unacceptable. Closing an account and offering a reset instead of honoring a valid payout request is neither fair nor solution-oriented.

I am sharing this experience so other traders can make informed decisions and understand how payout disputes may be handled.
I sincerely hope that MCF will reconsider this decision and reach a fair, transparent, and solution-oriented final resolution.

My Experience with trustpilot insane // support staff // maxx/liam/adenzo/kale// the behaviour of support staff is too polite and helps to solve a complete issues that everyone faced //and if we look on accounts spreads is almost 0 not completely but under 10 / on otherside // No Consistency rule ..no lot size restrictions // no extra excuses or any kinda bullshitt.. my all overr experience is // if i wannna rate then it is 5/5

I took an account 5 months ago, took 5 payouts.

Always within 48hrs.

I am sharing this to warn other traders.

MCF (My Crypto Funding) closed my funded account and confiscated my profits, but the most shocking part is this:

👉 They initially accused me using an account ID that does NOT belong to me.

Their first investigation email claimed rule violations on Account ID #719749, which is NOT my account.
Later, they admitted this was a mistake and apologized — meaning the case started with incorrect data.

Despite this serious error, they continued the investigation and shifted the blame to my real account, using an IP overlap claim as justification.

Important context:

I passed both evaluation phases legitimately

My funded account gained ~11% profit

I trade independently

I never shared access, signals, or strategies

I use a VPN due to regional restrictions — which their community previously indicated was acceptable

Even more concerning:
👉 They approved and funded my account after compliance checks,
👉 But only raised this issue after I requested a payout.

They refused to provide transparent evidence and relied on vague internal rules to justify:

Account termination

Full profit confiscation

Starting an investigation using the wrong account ID, then punishing a trader financially, raises serious concerns about professionalism, fairness, and trustworthiness.

I am posting this so other traders understand the risks before trusting this firm.

They deny my payout after 40 days waiting , my story begin following
- 3 December 2025 ,I requested payout 14716.69 $
- normally payout will be paid with in 48 hrs , but in my case it take 40days , I follow them many time , support team tell me it is in process and will get payout soon
- So after wait 40 days , They reply last email on 21 Jan 2025: my account review for prohibited trading strategies like gambling and reject payout so waste of time to wait 40 days

I had a mixed experience with MyCryptoFunding (MCF). Initially, the platform appeared reliable, and my first payouts were processed without major issues, which built confidence.
As my trading performance and profits increased, my latest payout request of approximately $6,916 was placed on hold—not rejected. In emails dated December 27, 2025, MCF stated this was a temporary pause for review and explicitly confirmed it was “not a payout rejection,” and that my account remained active and in good standing.
I complied fully by continuing to trade for additional days while adhering to all stated rules. My independent TradeZella journal documents this activity. After this period, my eligible profits increased, and I submitted payout requests totaling $8,963.07 across 2 accounts in mid-January 2026. One request was confirmed by MCF as being in “final processing.”

On January 19, 2026, I received a violation notice alleging shared IP activity and group trading—issues that had not been raised earlier. I appealed immediately, denied any coordination, and provided written explanations and supporting records. On January 21, MCF upheld the decision, citing an internal analysis, and stated that earlier communications were not binding.
I requested payment of the outstanding payouts ($8963) along with reimbursement of account fees ($1400) already paid, i.e., a total of $10,363. The only resolution offered was $700 subject to a Non-Disclosure Agreement, which I declined. Since then, there has been no further response despite multiple follow-ups.

Based on my experience, the application of rules appeared inconsistent once profits increased despite initial assurances. I am sharing this for transparency and awareness. All communications and records are documented and available if required. Traders, always journal independently and document everything—clarity and fairness should be standard.

Edit (Reply):
Thank you for your response.
However, your reply continues to rely on broad allegations without providing any specific or verifiable evidence. Merely stating “IP-related violations” and “coordinated trading indicators” without disclosing the exact data, dates, trades, IP logs, or the precise clauses allegedly breached does not meet basic standards of transparency or fair dealing.
No independent or third-party review was offered, and the conclusions referred to remain entirely internal and undisclosed. A unilateral internal assessment, without sharing supporting material, cannot reasonably be treated as conclusive.
Further, any communications suggesting eligibility for payout created a legitimate expectation, which was later withdrawn without furnishing concrete reasons or evidence. Labelling such communications as “informational” after the fact does not cure the lack of disclosure.
The offer of refund of evaluation fees, coupled with a permanent ban, appears to be an attempt at forced settlement rather than a reasoned resolution of the dispute. Declining such an offer should not be construed as acceptance of the allegations.
I maintain that all trading was conducted independently and in good faith, in accordance with the published terms. Unless specific evidence is disclosed, the decision remains arbitrary, disproportionate, and open to challenge.
I reserve all rights and remedies available in law.

No payout after 40 days and suddenly cancelled acount and accouising hedge with 7 sec :) do not trust this firm guys
Edit: my full name is does not metter but my comment is %100 percent geniune.
My id :127573

A great experience from MCF support team, response quick and guided me on how to claim my giveaway prize, thanks to MCF for the giveaway and Mr Dennis n Max for great assistance 👍👍👍

My English grammar is not that great but i don't wanna use AI for that.
Few Days ago i won a giveaway on there Twitter/X Account and won.
It only took few hours to claim my account after winners announced.

Also huge thanks for the friendly and professional support team Dennis ?Max 🤝🏻 that was a good experience.
Looking forward to work with you.
Cheers.

First time trading on this platform. Customer service support is great. Dennis and max were very helpful.

My phase 2 account which i was passing on eur/usd trade resulted in taking loss they have a very high spread on phase 2 accounts i showed them calculations they only refunded one side slippage not both sides for my account and on spx trade where my risk was 1.3r i ended up loosing 2r (400+ usd) because they have very unethical position sizing for es on their platform. Avoid them.

Upadate (14/01/2026)

(I don't understand how sharing my experience is against their terms and conditions)

My review is based on 2 clear issues:
1) I was passing my phase 2 with eur/usd trade which i explained to them. The discord support mentioned that i will be refunded for slippage and they will solve the issue. Issue was still unresolved and i received partial refund.
2) They have very high commission for spx500 (SandP500) i will reference 2 trades for example -trade 1: SPXUSD buy loss - 71.30 usd commission - 100 usd
trade 2: SPXUSD buy loss - 720.31 usd commission - 400 usd
Commission on 791 usd loss was 500 usd on a 50k account.

Mycryptofunding, best support propfirms, very fast, thank you very much, long life

In late February-April 2025, I had an AUDUSD trade stopped out on MyCryptoFunding even though the chart I saw didn’t show price reaching my stop level. Support initially told me it might be a platform glitch and discussed a refund. Later, after “investigating with the broker team / liquidity provider,” they changed the explanation to spread/ask-price widening during rollover/spread hours and said the chart shows bid history, not ask.

My issue wasn’t the ~$1 loss itself, it was the confusing shift in explanation, the lack of clear transparency around the execution data I was shown, and the way the case was handled over time.

After I asked for formal/legal contact details and raised concerns about fairness, the company said they would terminate my services / close my accounts, and they repeatedly warned about “defamation” and asked for additional written confirmations/confidentiality as a condition for further refunds.

They closed ALL my accounts, even the ones that had PASSED evaluation, without providing any sort of fair compensation.

Overall, this experience left me with low confidence in how disputes are handled and how transparent execution issues are explained. I can’t recommend them based on my experience.

EDIT:
In response to "Unfortunately, during the course of communication, your interactions with our support team became inappropriate and escalatory, despite repeated efforts to provide clear explanations in a respectful manner. As a result, and in line with our Terms of Service, we made the decision to discontinue our business relationship." quoted from MCFs response on this review:

This is simply not true, and MCF uses this just as an excuse to find a reason for why they should ban my accounts - Especially the accounts that passed evaluation.
MCF has confirmed themselves that their business model is based off of people buying new accounts and that very few actually passes evaluation.
This creates a direct conflict of them "suddenly" finding my behavior to be violating their ToS.

EDIT2:
The fact that MCF keeps claiming that my behavior towards their stuff violated their ToS, which is the reason why they closed all my accounts, is not true.

Just the fact that they're not sharing any specific details, or any sort of proof, shows how they don't have anything to stand on for this false claim.

It is true that some of my trading accounts passed evaluation and I have emails from MCF themselves to prove this. As soon as I had them pass evaluation, then all of a sudden my behavior violated their ToS - But it certainly didn't violate their ToS before when I had purchased accounts that I failed evaluation for.

Based on MCF's responses, one can assume that if you're a losing player your behavior is completely fine and acceptable.
Once you become a winning player - Your behavior violated their ToS and they will indeed close your accounts.

Really happy with the support I received. I got my account details on email as promised, and the team was quick to assist. Big thanks to Dennis + Adenzo for being helpful and efficient.

Plus points- More than 100 crypto pairs with 1:100 leverage, MT5, exchange level spreads for crypto
Minus points: Bad forex spreads, high commissions for indices, XAU and XAG blocked for trading
The indices have high commissions and spreads. Nikkei commissions are much bigger than its tick value so breakeven point is more than 100 points from entry. I lost 4% on Nikkei trade due to its commissions even when trade closed in profit of 60 points.
NQ CFD has a 4 points breakeven with their commissions, YM has 5 points spread + 4 points commissions. That makes breakeven level of 8 points on YM and NQ CFDs.
They should be crypto only firm, as trading other instruments is worthless.
XAU XAG blocked for trading when they are moving the most. XAU and XAG were not temporary blocks but were not available throughout the period of challenge phase. They made no changes even when notified about the same.