Chociaż nie weryfikujemy konkretnych wypowiedzi, ponieważ opinie recenzentów są ich własnymi opiniami, recenzje mogą zostać oznaczone jako „Zweryfikowane”, jeśli uda nam się potwierdzić, że doszło do rzeczywistej interakcji biznesowej. Dowiedz się więcej

Aby chronić integralność platformy, każda recenzja na naszej platformie—zweryfikowana lub nie—jest sprawdzana przez nasze oprogramowanie działające w trybie 24/7. Technologia ta została zaprojektowana w celu identyfikowania i usuwania treści, które naruszają nasze wytyczne, w tym recenzji, które nie opierają się na prawdziwym doświadczeniu. Zdajemy sobie sprawę, że możemy nie wychwycić wszystkiego, dlatego możesz oflagować wszystko, co według Ciebie mogliśmy przeoczyć. Dowiedz się więcej

Zobacz, co mówią recenzenci

Oceniono na 1 z 5

UMA Is the platform used on Polymarket for solving all disputes. Proof in internal chats demonstrate that the votes are associated to tokens. Math is very simple here, the more tokens, the more infl... Zobacz więcej

Oceniono na 1 z 5

uma.xyz prides itself on being a "truth machine" by giving incentive to vote correctly on subjective markets and make money. However, this couldn't be further from the truth. There is no such thing as... Zobacz więcej

Oceniono na 1 z 5

UMA is a CENTRALIZED platform OWNED BY polymarket, and that will do whatever their owners tell them to. Look onto the 'USA UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL POLYMARKET SCANDAL' which resulted in the scam and thef... Zobacz więcej

Oceniono na 1 z 5

Some day a whistleblower will spill all to a journalist and we'll hear all the dirt, but for now it's obvious that UMA and Polymarket can't be trusted to tell you the weather yet alone to trust with y... Zobacz więcej

1,2

Bardzo słaba

Wynik TrustScore: 1 na 5

65 recenzji

5 gwiazdek
4 gwiazdki
3 gwiazdki
2 gwiazdki
1 gwiazdka

Jak firma korzysta z Trustpilot

Dowiedz się, w jaki sposób pozyskiwane, oceniane i moderowane są ich recenzje i oceny.

Firmy korzystające z platformy Trustpilot nie mogą oferować żadnych zachęt ani płacić za ukrywanie recenzji. Recenzje są opiniami poszczególnych użytkowników, a nie platformy Trustpilot. Dowiedz się więcej

Oceniono na 1 z 5

Scam ❌

Scam ❌, don’t trust them!! I was completely ripped off!!!
After reaching out for help, 🄶🆁𝓔🆈𝓞𝓧🄷🆄🄱🆂 stepped in and got back £22,960 for me.
Highly recommended.

10 stycznia 2026
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

SCAM

The UMA resolution can be easily influenced by people with a lot of tokens, so the outcomes do not rely on truth, but rather which side has more money put in.

14 marca 2026
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

Dodgy

Some day a whistleblower will spill all to a journalist and we'll hear all the dirt, but for now it's obvious that UMA and Polymarket can't be trusted to tell you the weather yet alone to trust with your money.

14 stycznia 2026
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

They are running a massive scam scheme

They have manipulated markets that were more than obvious. There are whales with 6M UMA that decide 35% of a vote. This means even a couple whales can join and decide a market regardless if their decision is correct or not. Further more these whales bribe polymarket employes to change rules in the middle of a market. UMA also deletes messages and bans people who disagree with the whales. I got banned for 7 days for not agreeing white their decision

3 stycznia 2026
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

Whales manuplated the outcome

will-edgex-launch-a-token-in-2025?

Was a big scam, the obvious result was NO but UMA and Polymarket whales changed the results to YES

Very big scam and I know a lawsuit will follow as its obvious manuplation and insider manipulation.very obvious and SEC and other countries should follow suit to ban this scam company.

I am reporting to SEC and EU authorities too

2 stycznia 2026
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

UMA is a scam OWNED by polymarket

UMA is a CENTRALIZED platform OWNED BY polymarket, and that will do whatever their owners tell them to. Look onto the 'USA UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL POLYMARKET SCANDAL' which resulted in the scam and theft of over 7 million dollars

27 sierpnia 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

If I could give a negative review I…

If I could give a negative review I would. UMA is supposed to be a independent decentralized project made for resolving bets (particularly on poly market). In theory (emphasis on „theory“) they would resolve based off of facts. This is not what they do. They make decisions off of the voting stake (backed by buyable tokens). Basically no matter what it is you could just buy „votes“. Currently in the „Thailand bombs Cambodia by Friday“ bet the „NO“ betters (ones who voted it wouldn’t happen) currently have amble evidence showing there was no bombing yet the „YES“ betters (ones who voted that there would be bombing) are winning (have won) for the reasoning that „whales“ with hundreds of thousands of dollars bought out the market. Push for the death of UMA. I hope they get sued and those on the side of truth get the shares they deserve.

30 lipca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

Not decentralised nor honest

It claims to be a decentralised oracle, but 2 people hold near 40% of the UMA tokens with different wallets. It's very easy for them to bet on anything and then push for that outcome even against clear visual evidence and facts.

Don't be surprised if at some point UMA token holders will tell you the Earth is a cube.

8 lipca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

THIS WHOLE UMA SYSTEM'S CORRUPT

THIS WHOLE UMA SYSTEM IS BUILT ON A 100% CHANCE OF GETTING SCAMMED. IMAGINE LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THE MOST UMA SHARES CONTROL HOW A VOTE GOES WITH 0 REGARD TO REAL WORLD FACTS. BE AWARE OF IT & STAY AWAY FROM ANYTHING THIS SYSTEM IS INVOLVED IN!

15 czerwca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

Not impartial, money oriented.

UMA Is the platform used on Polymarket for solving all disputes.
Proof in internal chats demonstrate that the votes are associated to tokens.
Math is very simple here, the more tokens, the more influential the vote will be. The majority receive a share, making the vote completely manipulated by money volume instead of sources or facts. Doesn't sound very decentralised,right?

1 lipca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

These are the real scammers

These are the real scammers! The decision in favor of YES or NO is not determined by an honest vote, but by a few large holders of UMA protocol. Deliberate market manipulation. Do not contact them under any circumstances or you will lose all your money.

2 lipca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 1 z 5

Scam website

Scam website. Letting people who made the bet decide what the result is.. giving the high paying people to choose what the result is.

1 lipca 2025
Opinia niezależna

Czy to Twoja firma?

Zatwierdź swój profil, aby uzyskać dostęp do darmowych narzędzi biznesowych Trustpilot i lepiej poznawać swoich klientów.

Załóż darmowe konto

Doświadczenie Trustpilot

Każdy może napisać recenzję na Trustpilot. Osoby, które wystawiają opinie, mają prawo do ich edytowania lub usuwania w dowolnym momencie. Będą one wyświetlane, dopóki aktywne jest konto.

Firmy mogą prosić o wystawienie recenzji za pomocą automatycznych zaproszeń. Te oznakowane jako zweryfikowane, dotyczą prawdziwych doświadczeń.

Dowiedz się więcej o innych rodzajach recenzji.

Wykorzystujemy wiedzę odpowiednio wykwalifikowanych pracowników oraz sprytną technologię, aby chronić naszą platformę. Dowiedz się, jak zwalczamy fałszywe recenzje.

Dowiedz się więcej o procesie recenzji Trustpilot.

Oto 8 wskazówek jak napisać świetną recenzję.

Weryfikacja może pomóc zapewnić, że recenzje, które czytasz na Trustpilot są napisane przez prawdziwych ludzi.

Oferowanie zachęt w zamian za pisanie recenzji lub wysyłanie próśb o ich wystawienie w sposób selektywny może wpłynąć na TrustScore, co jest sprzeczne z naszymi wytycznymi.

Dowiedz się więcej