Kent Traffic Law Recenzje 

194
•
Wynik TrustScore: 5 na 5

4,9

Chociaż nie weryfikujemy konkretnych wypowiedzi, ponieważ opinie recenzentów są ich własnymi opiniami, recenzje mogą zostać oznaczone jako „Zweryfikowane”, jeśli uda nam się potwierdzić, że doszło do rzeczywistej interakcji biznesowej. Dowiedz się więcej

Aby chronić integralność platformy, każda recenzja na naszej platformie—zweryfikowana lub nie—jest sprawdzana przez nasze oprogramowanie działające w trybie 24/7. Technologia ta została zaprojektowana w celu identyfikowania i usuwania treści, które naruszają nasze wytyczne, w tym recenzji, które nie opierają się na prawdziwym doświadczeniu. Zdajemy sobie sprawę, że możemy nie wychwycić wszystkiego, dlatego możesz oflagować wszystko, co według Ciebie mogliśmy przeoczyć. Dowiedz się więcej

Zobacz, co mówią recenzenci

Oceniono na 5 z 5

I Recieved a single justice procedure against me in the post for speeding. So decided to get professional help for the mitigation. Best decision I ever made. Sunil was exceptional from the first phone... Zobacz więcej

Reakcja na opinię

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Received the outcome required, very knowledgeable individual who plans ahead. Was able to collate the right evidence needed to support me and identify key points to help keep the licence... Zobacz więcej

Reakcja na opinię

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Speeding at over 100 mph. Guilty Plea. Amazing result thanks to Sunil from Kent Law Traffic. Would highly recommend - he gave us confidence with his expertise and guidance. Very approachable a very... Zobacz więcej

Reakcja na opinię

Oceniono na 5 z 5

From the very first telephone call Sunil acted in an extremely honest, upfront and professional manner offering no false hope. Throughout all communications he kept strictly to business and facts whic... Zobacz więcej

Reakcja na opinię

Informacje dotyczące firmy

  1. Adwokat

Napisane przez firmę

We provide specialist legal advice and representation for those facing loss of licence through prosecution for motoring offences from speeding to drink driving (and everything in between). Whether you wish to plead, 'Not Guilty,' and seek to avoid a conviction or, 'Guilty,' and seek to avoid a disqualification we can help you.


Dane kontaktowe

4,9

Doskonała

Wynik TrustScore: 5 na 5

194 recenzji

5 gwiazdek
4 gwiazdki
3 gwiazdki
2 gwiazdki
1 gwiazdka

W ostatnim czasie nie zapraszano do recenzowania

Ta firma nie zapraszała ostatnio swoich klientów do recenzowania, dlatego recenzje mogą nie być w pełni reprezentatywne

Jak firma korzysta z Trustpilot

Dowiedz się, w jaki sposób pozyskiwane, oceniane i moderowane są ich recenzje i oceny.

4,9

Wszystkie recenzje

(194)

Liczba recenzji w ciągu ostatnich 12 miesięcy: 20

Napisz recenzję
Firmy korzystające z platformy Trustpilot nie mogą oferować żadnych zachęt ani płacić za ukrywanie recenzji. Recenzje są opiniami poszczególnych użytkowników, a nie platformy Trustpilot. Dowiedz się więcej

Oceniono na 5 z 5

My 19 year old son was arrested for 4 driving offences

My 19 year old son was arrested for 4 driving offences, he was looking at the most serious of charges, minimum penalty, 12 weeks imprisonment. Like you all, I was looking for the best around to represent my son, looked at the reviews on here and thought, “this guy sounds like he knows his stuff!”

I contacted Sunil, he explained that he was waiting for another client to turn up at a meeting and might have to cut our call short. Like a gentlemen, within a few hours after his meetings he called me back and I continued to explain my situation with my son. He was very calm and reassuring that he could help.

Sunil shared his fixed fees with me and we arranged to meet at a hotel and discuss his case. At the 90 minute meeting, we were left on uncertain terms, this was a serious case. From the start of the meeting Sunil was very knowledgeable straight away in the meeting, he had already read and understood the 4 separate charges my son was facing, we talked through the evening and shared the complete picture of the evening with him. We were advised to plead guilty to all 4 charges, which we could not argue with. Sunil explained the judge doesn't know my son and needed brief ideas of his life and commitments, he explained he was building a picture of my son and the situation to give him the best outcome he could.

On court day we were advised by Sunil he would arrive early and speak with the prosecution and probation officer, so our day was not longer than needed. This was where we saw Sunil go to another level, he “mooched” around the court before everything started, made sure everyone knew how we were going to plea and not present anyone any problems in court. However, should things change in court, we had some back up plans to help my son through the charges. When entering court, it was still very much 50/50 my son would be coming home with me.

Sunil knows the system, he knows everything about the law and court house. He put the prosecution at ease before the court opened, this worked in our favour. The charges were downgraded from one to two we had pleaded guilty to all four charges. Sunil stuck to all relevant facts and when the court came back after 10 minutes they advised they were issuing my son a 17 month ban, 40 hours community service, £199 fees and charges. We could finally breath, my son was coming home with me.

Sunil is unique, when you reach out he might not be the cheapest out there, but if you want to sleep at night, find the money! He takes on every case personally, you don’t deal with any secretaries or juniors, it is just Sunil. His not greedy in the number of cases he takes he invests in every case and will do his upmost BEST to represent you Trust this guy he really is the BEST.

22 października 2025
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

For any parent finding that his son has been summoned to court to face serious motoring offences is the most worrying of situations. Nevertheless, upon receiving such a call I consider it my responsibility to be honest about the gravity of the situation at the same time as clarifying what I would hope to achieve for the client. Sometimes, this can be as straightforward as simply tyring to avoid an immediate custodial sentence.

Of course, until the prosecution case papers have been obtained the defence may not necessarily be able to gauge where on the scale the offences are likely to sit. It is only after the prosecution bundle has been obtained that I usually meet face to face with the client as I can then take full instructions upon the case and upon the potential background mitigating factors that may apply.

It is always best to go to court fully prepared and having fully explained the court’s sentencing options to the client. In this case, unfortunately, the case did fall into the most serious category with a starting point for sentence, as you state, of 12 weeks in prison. Of course, this is only a ‘start point’ for sentence which can go up or down the scale according to the relative weight of aggravating and mitigating factors. In our case your son was fortunate in that the prosector outlined the facts in a relatively favourable way and the court then accepted all of the mitigation that was put forward.

The outcome was a particularly lenient result (more lenient than we could reasonably have asked for). I regard it as my duty to be frank with clients from the very first phone call and then to work towards the best possible outcome in the circumstances. I am very pleased that this was achieved in your son’s case and I am especially gratified that you felt so well supported throughout the case.

Thank you very much indeed for taking the time and trouble to post such a careful review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Another Favorable Outcome!

This is the second time that I've used Sunil at kent Traffic Law for a serious driving offence and once again the outcome was far more favorable than I ever would have expected.
Sunil was only fully briefed on the details surrounding the offense on the morning of the court case but was still able to present a comprehensive and persuasive defense, which led to a very positive outcome.
Sunil was extremely thorough and left no stone unturned in seeking to understand the circumstances surrounding my offense, which could have led to immediate custody, to the point where I was wondering why such details were relevant but it all became clear when he presented the case. His ability to read the court while it's in process and tweak his presentation accordingly is testament to his 30 years of experience as a barrister.
I've noticed he has a deep respect for the law and the court system, and manages to build repore with the court staff, while putting you at ease making a highly stressful situation a lot more manageable.
The great thing about using Sunil is having direct access to a highly accomplished Barrister, who deals with you personally from the initial conversation to the court representation, which is far more effective than going through a firm of solicitors, where you'll often have to laise with multiple people and be assigned a representative on the day of the trial.
I recommend his services to anyone who needs a highly motivated and passionate legal representative with a proven track record of success.

24 października 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Your case was unusual in that we did not have the opportunity to meet well in advance of the hearing to prepare the case. However, as I had represented you in the past I was willing to take your case albeit 'late in the day'. We met very early on the morning of the hearing and you had sent me a very full written background. Therefore, I was able to take further instructions from you at court before advising you of the options in terms of sentencing and procedure. You opted to be sentenced on the day and we did 'get the rub of the green' in terms of having a fair minded prosecutor and court.

As you state, above, I always deal with cases personally and do not send agents or juniors to court. I regard my clients' cases as too important for that. I find that continuity of representation and advice, from start to finish, tends to be reflected in positive outcomes. I was very pleased to see that this was the case with you.

Thank you for leaving such a thoughtful review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Drink in charge Vehicle.

From the beginning Sunil was the BEST and got the outcome I was praying for! can’t thank Sunil enough for all his help with my case. Sunil was very professional, empathetic and understanding of my situation. After my first call he took time and listened my case carefully and explained what outcome can happen. But he presented my case in a professional way, and the outcome was I was expecting. My fear was that I would receive a lengthy ban or potentially a disqualification. I am pleased with this outcome as I’m aware it could have been a lot worse. I kept my licence with out disqualification. When I walked out after my hearing I said to Sunil you have given be second life. I would highly recommend Sunil.

17 października 2025
Opinia niezależna
Oceniono na 5 z 5

Professional and managed my expections

From the moment I found Sunil online, he was extremely professional and transparent. I had already spoken with several other firms, but many seemed to make unrealistic promises while charging high fees. Given the nature of my offence, I knew avoiding the consequences completely was unlikely, so it worried me that others claimed they could guarantee a 100% positive outcome.

This is what set Sunil apart — he managed my expectations from the start and was completely honest with me throughout. Before the court date, we met and went through every detail of my case thoroughly. In court, Sunil was outstanding — he presented a strong, confident defence and truly commanded the room.

Although I did receive a driving ban, thanks to Sunil’s help, the outcome was far better than expected. I would highly recommend him to anyone looking for fair, honest, and professional legal representation.

10 października 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

In many cases it is not in the client's interest to contest a case even if a period of obligatory disqualification would follow upon a 'Guilty' plea. The client's interests lie in understanding, realistically, what his or her chances are of a 'Not Guilty' verdict if the case is contested. Even the strongest cases can be challenged in court. However, this is likely to dramatically increase legal and other costs (such as the time it takes to finish a case, the number of hearings necessary, and the overall stress involved). Therefore, an initial assessment should be made as to whether, realistically, there is a good chance of 'winning' the case. If the reality is the chance is minimal the client should be told this at the outset. I find clients, such as yourself, appreciate this approach. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Drink Drving

My husband was arrested for dink driving first offence after a clean license, we didn't know which way to turn, we looked up representation and came across Kent traffic law, we called and within an hour Sunil called back and my husband had a free 45 minute call where all circumstances of the arrest were discussed, he advised as my husband was three times over the limit it was a serious offence and he would realistically be looking at a minimum of
2 and a 1/2 years ban, fine and community service. When we looked around and saw Sunil was a barrister and wanted the best to face as small a ban as possible so my husband wouldn't loose his job, I checked the barristers register and all was fine full member and listed. We were advised of the price and told we would meet in a hotel reception area 20 minutes from home, as an overly cautious person I felt slightly unsure of handing over the money before meeting Sunil, but I was so very wrong as Sunil arrived early and he controlled the meeting by asking all necessary relevant questions advising us when we cut in with irrelevant information, he explained the judge doesn't know my husband and needed a brief ideas of his life and commitments, he explained he was building a picture of my husband and the situation to give him the best outcome he could, on court day we were advised by Sunil he would arrive early and speak with the prosecution and probation officer as my husband had a serious motorbike accident in the past and finds it painful to do physical activities or stand for long we then had the opportunity to see the probation officer before we entered court and she suggested an alcohol tag as my husband had admitted alcohol was a problem in his life. We had already been attending AA from the day he got arrested so that was a perfect option for us, thus without increasing his fine it just reiterated his commitment to attending AA. Sunil spoke to the court about my husband his good character, his clean license, his distance to work, travel time, length of employment even going back to saying he left schoolband went straight into a job, factors i would not have thought about mentioning, but Sunil really knew the questions to ask us that were relevant making us more relaxed and confident in his ability. never advising the court of what he wanted just suggesting it was the courts decision but,if the court could please bear in mind all the previous factors and the impact on how he would be affected by his sentence. Sunil stuck to all relevant facts and when the court came back after 10 minutes they advised they were issuing a 12 month ban YES 12 MONTHS BAN which could be reduced to 9 MONTHS ban if the TTC course was completed. ( not available for everyone only if the court thinks its suitable, again Sunil suggested the course may be an option but thankfully the court agreed. My husband was given the alcohol tag for 4 months and a fine and costs of less than £800 total. WHAT A RESULT!!!!!! Trust this guy he really is the BEST.

1 października 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

You have kindly set out a fairly full and accurate account of what transpires when my services are engaged. Firstly, I take the time to ensure that I understand the caller’s situation. I give ‘provisional guidance’ not legal advice during that call. If it is clear that I can help I quote fixed fees. We meet in order for me to take detailed instructions from the client both as to the offence and as to his or her background. (I have recently learned that some solicitors’ firms take instructions by questionnaire! Others have a telephone or virtual meeting. I consider that there is no substitute for an in-person meeting). At the meeting I give formal legal advice as to the range of sentencing options. I also advise the client at this stage if any steps should be taken prior to the hearing date in order to improve sentencing prospects.

On the day of the hearing I personally attend to represent the client. (However, solicitors make prolific use of agents, such as junior barristers or local solicitors, to represent their clients so that, frequently, clients are represented by lawyers they have not met before. I consider this unsatisfactory. This is why I attend personally). I usually arrange with the client to meet at court early in order to answer any last minute questions and to ensure that we are completely ready for the hearing.

As a senior barrister I have decades of experience of oral advocacy. I use that experience to present the most persuasive plea of mitigation to ensure that the client receives the best outcome his or her circumstances will allow. In your husband’s case he had very good mitigation which the court accepted in full. It is very unusual for the court to depart from the sentencing guidelines but in this case they did just that! This is why the court felt able to literally give the shortest disqualification allowed by law. I was really pleased for him as this gives your husband the best chance of retaining his employment.

In so far as fixed date court cases, such as this one, are concerned I only take the case if I can see it through personally from start to finish as I believe this gives the client the best chance of the most favourable outcome. There are no guarantees but, fortunately, this is what happened in your husband’s case.

Thank you very much for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

A really good experience

Having made the mistake of picking my phone up while driving, I contacted Sunil for help. Sunil was great from start to finish. He explained everything to me clearly and was realistic and honest in what our position was. As a new driver I was faced with the possibility of having my license revoked which would have been disastrous, but with Sunil's help and by following his recommendations I was able to avoid that and instead received a short driving ban. I would certainly recommend

7 sierpnia 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Yours was a brief and innocent driver's error. Yet, with the standard penalty for a mobile phone offence being 6 penalty points and a fine you faced, as a new driver, the probability that your driving licence would be revoked. Given that the waiting lists for taking repeat tests are at an all-time record length this could have meant that you would be without a licence for anything from several months to a year. As you cannot afford to do without your driving licence for any protracted period of time we needed to persuade the court that, in your particular circumstances, this would have been wholly unjust and invite them to consider an alternative way of sentencing you. In order to build your case we met face-to-face for me to take full instructions and to advise you upon the steps you needed to take to improve your prospects of a successful outcome. In your case this meant trying to persuade the court to disqualify you from driving immediately but for a relatively short period. In the end the careful preparation paid off as the court fully accepted all of the defence mitigation and disqualified you from driving for only 7 days! This was the ideal outcome from the Defence perspective given that the sentencing guidelines mean that ordinarily a new driver's licence would be revoked. I am pleased you received this outcome. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

I was caught speeding going over 100mph…

I was caught speeding going over 100mph and was after representation.

After finding Kent Traffic law and reading the reviews I phoned up and spoke with Sunil.
He was very professional and I decided to go ahead with him.

I followed all of Sunils advice and guidance through the court process and ultimately I kept my licence and I can’t recommend him enough. He was brilliant throughout the process and answered any questions I had and ultimately got me the result I needed.

17 lipca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Once you are speeding at over 100mph then, depending upon all the circumstances of the case, it can be very difficult to avoid disqualification. The court takes into account a range of factors and, of particular concern to them, would have been your age and the margin by which you were exceeding 100 mph. However, as your business depended upon retaining your licence you engaged me for a meeting to advise you. You took all of the steps that I advocated in advance of your hearing. On the day in court we were very well prepared. As you saw, however, the issue was on a knife-edge. However, after retiring to consider the matter the court decided to simply endorse 6 points and order you to pay a fine. You were thrilled with this outcome as it meant disaster for your business had been avoided. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

You get what you pay for

Kent Traffic Law assisted me twice recently on a related matter. Each time it has been money well spent. Firstly by providing a pre prepared statement after giving me sound advice in meetings, which certainly got my very serious charges reduced and secondly when the case eventually went to court and I got to witness Sunil representing me and he once again was able to get me the best possible outcome considering the circumstances. In each of my dealings with him he has been highly professional, diligent and knowlegeable. He spent time speaking in layman's terms so I understood the options and and probabilities and delivered the best possible outcome. I would not hesitate to use his services again if he was available and could help.

12 czerwca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

You first contacted me at a very early stage in the investigation which meant that I was able to take full instructions from you and then advise you how to deal with your forthcoming voluntary police interview. In your case it was decided that I should help you to prepare a 'pre-prepared statement' that you could take with you to the interview setting out the most important aspects of your account clearly and concisely and in a way which best protected your interests. Many people don't contact me until after they have been interviewed by which time they have often already badly damaged their own interests. In your case this meant that you were off to a good start. So, by the time the case came to court you were already in a far superior position than you otherwise would have been in. This enabled us to build upon the foundation you had laid in interview. Thus you were able to secure the best possible result in court. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

After speeding at over 90Mph

After speeding at over 90Mph, i needed the help of Sunil Rupasinha. not only did he guide me through the process of how the law works, he explained very clearly step by step the documentation that needed completing.
After pleading guilty to the offence i was delighted to receive just 6 points and a fine. Overall 10/10 and a big thank you.

17 kwietnia 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Of course, the severity of the penalty depends on the extent by which the speed limit was exceeded in each case. In your case, you had received a Single Justice Procedure Notice and were hoping to avoid being required to attend court for consideration of disqualification. The only way to avoid the risk of a ban is by avoiding being called to court. With this in mind we met and I drafted a suggested written mitigation submission based upon your instructions to me about your case and about your personal background. Fortunately, it worked; the written submission was accepted at face value and you avoided the costs and stress of being called to court and avoided a ban too! The desired outcome. Thank you for posting your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Penalty Points Disqualification

Penalty Points Disqualification

I already had 9 points on my license and got caught again for speeding by a speed camera. The Barrsiter at Kent Traffic Law i.e Mr Sunil Rupasinha was honest and helpful. He represented me in the court and saved me from getting a six month ban. It’s because of his sincere efforts that the outcome was satisfactory.

20 marca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

You were extremely fortunate to avoid a minimum 6 month ban as I advised you from the outset that we would need to be very lucky indeed to be successful in court. However, we prepared your case in advance and I advised you on the court procedure and the way in which you would most probably be questioned in court. This meant that you were not taken by surprise by the questions and knew how best to respond. In the end, the Bromley Magistrates were lenient with you but I find that the better cases are prepared the greater the chances of a sympathetic outcome! Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Drink Driving

My son was charged with drink driving, and after reading the excellent reviews for Kent Traffic Law, I decided to contact Sunil. From our initial phone conversation to the face-to-face meeting with my son, Sunil was incredibly thorough. He asked detailed questions, carefully noting even the smallest details.

In court, his summary was clear and persuasive, outlining the potential consequences of a lengthy ban. Thanks to his representation, the court imposed a 12-month driving ban, with the option to reduce it by 3 months upon completing the TTC course due to the lower reading.

Sunil’s expertise and professionalism made a difficult situation much easier to navigate. I highly recommend his services.

10 marca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

The consequences of a drink driving conviction include a mandatory driving ban of at least 12 months although it is often much longer. The court has to determine within which sentencing bracket each offence falls dependent on its assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors. Once it has determined the correct bracket it has to determine where within the bracket the sentence will fall. These are matters which are often disputed between the prosecution and defence. In your son's case, however, the sentence ultimately fell at the very bottom end enabling him to receive the most lenient sentence possible. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Book Sunil, you won't go wrong

I had three days to sort my problem, which was an idiot using my licence details to run up 12 points without me knowing. It was only because I had to carryout a licence check that I found the problem.

This where Sunil the BARRISTER of Kent law came in. I found on Facebook by chance!

I then messaged him on his website and within 10 MINUTES HE CONTACTED ME BY PHONE, to find out he could help. It's a great feeling when someone in the know speaks to you at your lowest ebb and starts taking the problem and acts immediately, to resolve the issue in COURT, whereby, I spoke to him on Monday 3rd March, he rearranged his schedule to meet me at 1100, Wednesday 5th. We had until 1400 until my cases were heard.

Sunil, started there and then by searching out the official of the courts, talking and negotiating whether anything could be to have cases all in one sitting.

He sought out the Prosecution officer, Sunil discussed the case with him, he then liaised with the court officials, this all done in the background.

We then went in for my case to be heard, Sunil had sorted the cases in one, the prosecuter agreed to make checks re. My PROPER DETAILS and no the FRAUDSTERS, the prosecution agreed to drop the charging.

Sunil was the reason this happened, due to the hard work he did in the background and his experience was vital to the outcome.

Final point, Sunil informed me that not all courts allow this sort of accomodation but I genuinely feel, that having a BARRISTER by your side, certainly helps.

THANK YOU SUNIL, I HOPE YOU BECOME MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN YOU ARE. ANYBODY READING THIS MAKE SURE YOU GIVE SUNIL JUICY CASES TO GET HIS TEETH INTO.

5 marca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

You contacted me only a couple of days before your case was listed for hearing (at 2pm one day last week). I usually meet all of my clients face to face in advance of the hearing date to prepare for court but there simply wasn't time to do this. In the circumstances, I arranged to meet you at court at 1130am instead. You brought your case papers to court along with 2 further sets of papers for other cases which would have been listed in future. Once it became apparent that the same impersonator issue was common to all 3 of your cases I spoke to the court staff (the court clerk and the cps prosecutor) in between cases in the morning list. These discussions continued through the lunch hour. By 2pm when your case was called on everyone was on your side; you were the innocent victim of an impersonator and were unable to use your licence due to penalty points racked up by a fraudster. The court agreed to deal with all 3 cases at once; all were withdrawn saving you the stress and worry of having cases hanging over your head for weeks or months to come. I am bound to say that, although you wouldn't have had access to the court staff as I did in between cases, that the staff of many courts would not have been so obliging as to deal with all 3 matters when only one was listed. However, this approach did meet the merits of the situation as well as allowing you to 'kill three birds with one stone'! I was really pleased for you and didn't know myself what to expect until I had read the papers at court. To top it all off we then sought out the police liaison officer at court who was kind enough to advise you how to protect yourself from the fraudster in future. This was an unusual case but justice was done in the end. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Exceptional service

Upon speaking to Sunil he put myself at ease from the very start. The conversation we had to start with outlined what I should exspect ,what could happen and what could be done on my behalf. I can not praise Sunil enough for his service which at all times was excellent.

6 marca 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Yours was a troubling case in that loss of licence would have been a complete disaster for you for so many reasons. Fortunately, with careful preparation and planning the court was persuaded to accept all of our submissions so that you can continue to drive. Thank you very much for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

If you want the best! Sunil is the best!

The difference between having a solicitor and a barrister is evident! Having direct access to the best is the best chance you have if like me you rely heavily upon your license to work.
I was facing most likely a hefty fine along with a lengthy ban !
Sunil’s expertise ensured I suffered neither I am so grateful.
I couldn’t have hoped for a better result!

Thank you

24 lutego 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

When you first contacted me you already had an approach in mind to these allegations as you had already spoken to solicitors. We had a telephone discussion and straightaway realised that it is not always easy for the non-lawyer to pick the best way forward. We met for a face-to-face consultation and settled upon our strategy. Certain steps were taken in advance of the court hearing. We attended court today and, although there is never a guarantee, everything worked very well to give you the result you sought and enable you to keep working. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

New Driver facing Court- Parent’s perspective

New Driver facing Court- Parent’s Perspective

Sunil was excellent. My New Driver son was facing Court for a driving licence/traffic related charge. From the get go it was obvious that Sunil cared about what we told him and that he would and did truly represent my son with the same level of care you would give to your own child, giving the tough message of what a likely outcome would be, but then ensuring that he did his very best to mitigate away from that happening. Despite the circumstances being against my son, Sunil’s advocacy and knowledge saved my son’s licence from being revoked. I can thoroughly recommend Sunil; he achieved a highly professional and amicable outcome, if you are looking for the right advocate to get your case across in the best way possible, he is the right choice.

4 lutego 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Your son couldn't afford to have 6 points endorsed on his licence as this would have meant revocation of licence. In turn, this would have caused him significant adverse consequences. Many new drivers find themselves in a similar position. In such cases, once all the relevant information has been gathered it is up to the courtroom advocate to make as persuasive a submission as possible to seek to dissuade the court from taking the usual course of action in such situations. Fortunately, the court was persuaded to our way of thinking and your son has been able to continue with his work and life as before. I am pleased this outcome was obtained. Thank you for posting your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Exceptional Barrister

Sunil was a pleasure to deal with; his years of experience are evident and he gave me sage advice in a non judgmental manner. I would have no hesitation in recommending his services.

31 lipca 2024
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Being accused of a motoring offence can have very serious consequences. If I take a case, unlike solicitors firms, I deal with the matter from the first enquiry all the way through to any court hearing. This way I can ensure continuity of advice and representation from start to finish. My clients find that they obtain correspondingly favourable outcomes. I am pleased I was able to help you. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

I felt like as if I was walking holding…

I felt like as if I was walking holding a torch light with me. My path was full of darkness but with my experience, I can say that it was actually enlightened by someone else and that someone else was nobody but my solicitor. It was a great experience and I do highly recommend this service to all in need.

8 stycznia 2025
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

Being prosecuted in the courts for motoring offences, when you've never previously been in that situation can be a daunting and worrying experience (and that's before taking into account the risk of loss of licence and all that that might entail). However, even the most difficult situations can be tackled with honest and pragmatic advice. I was really pleased that the court accepted your mitigation in full and sentenced you accordingly. Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

Totting up 12 points

I had 12 points and faced losing my license as a consequence.. before I decided to go with sunil I thought I could do it myself.. well, it was a great decision to go with with sunil I 100% wouldn't of been ready for court without him.. and he was 100% committed to helping me keep my license and he succeeded 😁.. thank you

20 grudnia 2024
Opinia niezależna
Logo Kent Traffic Law

Odpowiedź od Kent Traffic Law

What motorists often don't realise (until it's too late) is that it is very easy to 'score own goals' in court; in other words, unless you have been advised in detail of how the law applies to the facts of your case and what the likely procedure will be in court, it is very easy indeed to say things which will actually make your chances of success worse in court. Fortunately, as you booked a conference in advance we were able to go through the facts of your case and prepare how to present it at its most persuasive. This was just as well as your job and more was on the line. It's only after experiencing your court hearing that you can assess just how easy it would have been to lose! Thank you for your review.

Oceniono na 5 z 5

After speaking with several solicitors…

After speaking with several solicitors and barristers, we decided to instruct Sunil to support us in my husband's upcoming court appearance. He had pleaded guilty to excessive speeding but we knew the penalties were severe, it would also impact our family greatly and in particular my husband's job would be impacted. Sunil provided a honest, direct and supportive approach in the way he advised us. We only liaised with Sunil either by phone, in person or email. That gave us peace of mind. My husband was given a lenient sentence and we believe that this would not have been possible if we did not have Sunil representing us. Sunil was not cheap but his support and advice was invaluable. We would always suggest that you speak with Sunil about your situation and see how he can support you - we would recommend him.

10 grudnia 2024
Opinia niezależna

Doświadczenie Trustpilot

Każdy może napisać recenzję na Trustpilot. Osoby, które wystawiają opinie, mają prawo do ich edytowania lub usuwania w dowolnym momencie. Będą one wyświetlane, dopóki aktywne jest konto.

Wykorzystujemy wiedzę odpowiednio wykwalifikowanych pracowników oraz sprytną technologię, aby chronić naszą platformę. Dowiedz się, jak zwalczamy fałszywe recenzje.

Dowiedz się więcej o procesie recenzji Trustpilot.

Oto 8 wskazówek jak napisać świetną recenzję.

Weryfikacja może pomóc zapewnić, że recenzje, które czytasz na Trustpilot są napisane przez prawdziwych ludzi.

Oferowanie zachęt w zamian za pisanie recenzji lub wysyłanie próśb o ich wystawienie w sposób selektywny może wpłynąć na TrustScore, co jest sprzeczne z naszymi wytycznymi.

Dowiedz się więcej