Kartoteka Recenzje 9

I paid 12000 USD to have several articles removed from a group of websites. Initially, the pages appeared to be taken down, and I believed the issue had been resolved.
Several months later, I discovered that similar content had become available again. While some URLs and headlines had changed, I felt that much of the original material remained substantially the same. I was disappointed because I expected a more permanent outcome.
Afterward, I was offered additional paid services that were described as providing broader coverage and longer-term protection. Based on my experience, I decided not to proceed further.
Before paying for any content-removal service, I recommend carefully reviewing the terms, asking what happens if content reappears in the future, and obtaining any guarantees in writing. My experience did not match my expectations.

I would advise readers to approach information from this website very carefully. The platform resembles several other “kompromat-style” sites that publish controversial material and allegedly monetize article removals. Independent verification is absolutely necessary before trusting anything posted here.

We got an offer called a yearly campaign for twelve thousand dollars. They promise deletion and no future negative. We refused and new posts appeared on ruskompromat info and vlasti .io.

First a baseless post then an offer to pay in crypto for removal and finally a new demand after the next clone. Exact replay of the Alliance Bank episode now running on kompromat1 .online and its mirrors.

We got an offer called a yearly campaign for twelve thousand dollars. They promise deletion and no future negative. We refused and new posts appeared on ruskompromat info and vlasti .io.

Сначала удалили статью за 3500, потом прислали черновик новой и намекнули что можно её “предотвратить” если заплатить ещё.

paid $5000, then they asked for more

I paid, they deleted it, then it came back. Same game every time – Konstantin Chernenko behind this.