Darwinex Zero Recenzje 364

Très bonne alternative au profirm classique

Tengo varios robots operando en la cuenta de Darwinex Zero. Si se hacen las cosas bien se puede tener asignación en poco tiempo. Una muy buena opción.

Top, can recommend it to everyone!

Great experience, good company everithing like promised.

Son comprometidos con lo q anuncian hay por q hay plataformas que no son coherentes

Experiencia buena, traiding real , posibilidad de retiros reales tener un trackrecord totalmente guardado que en un futuro te pueda servir para cualquier cosa, tener la capacidad de hacer traiding con poco dinero y que sea tu propio rendimiento el que te lleve a ganar capital de inversores o capital semilla en mi caso , si quieres hacer las cosas bien merece mucho la pena

Es una empresa seria en la que se puede confiar, aclaran rapidamente las dudas.

Lo que dicen, lo cumplen. Acabo de retirar 2.332 euros

Muy original el sistema, totalmente consistente para soportar toda la infraestructura... Es para traders serios y que de verdad construyen un futuro en este negocio

El mejor servicio con diferencia para demostrar tus habilidades como trader y y optar a gestionar capital de terceros.
Los intereses de Darwinex están 100% alineados con los trades.

Su plataforma es fácil de entender, tiene toda la información necesaria y cuando me he comunicado con soporte han sido muy claros y atentos.

Great experience, I truly recommended to any one who wants to build a track records.

18 meses con rentabilidad positiva de 65%. y ganar 45 euros es para dudar mucho del entorno y de la app.

buena experiencia

Me is a Classic Darwinex trader with multiple Classic Darwins. Was forced to trade multiple Zeros, as we, the Classic Darwins, simply got smoked by the Zero Darwins! Now our tribe (there are 10+ of us) is trading both Classic and Zero Darwins (usually more than one per person). All is fair now. Payments are regular. 1-month and 3-month. I personally do prefer the 3-mo ones. If you have a good strategy? Open a Zero and purchase the permanent allocation of €100,000 and just ride the wave! Recently boosters were introduced. One can purchase up to €400,000 in boosters, which is amazing deal! Your index will make between 15% and 25% on an average. If you have really great strategy to put in there, there might be gains up to 45% to 55% per year. Your share is 15% from these gains. You do your own math. Numbers are hard to beat. It is a cliche, but it is crazy good (only if you have a good system to put in your Zero Darwin!)... My brother uses reversed martingale system. The heaviest lot stats first, then the lots gets downsized to the lowest possible to trade. The Zero system loves his reversed martingale, as the EQ curve gets nearly flat when the times gets hard... The gains from the heavy lot cannot be destroyed by the draw-down created by the following smaller lot (who now gets the punches, until the rate moves once again)... Just an example.

For reference:
- Me Zeros are PEFW and JGBQ
- Me brother Zero's is ICFX

I used to be an advocate of the darwinexzero ecosystem. It does reward longer timescales encouraging the development of a long term track record and it is important to appreciate this. I have been running my darwin since April 2025 and received allocations for all but one month. The payouts are a bit slow to process but the cash does arrive without issue. However my recent experiences have changed my previously positve view. Having made a small performance fee of around 450E for August, I decided to leave it in the account to pay for a year's worth of subs. Apparently, they made a mistake with a previous award and then withdrew (some would say stole) my earned performance fees without prior communication. However, this is not the end. The hidden issue is their ""risk engine" and the score it generates to adjust trades AFTER the event. I look at my risk graph which showed a score of 0.18 at the beginning of the index phase which has dropped to 0.09. How is it possible to make a return on this without massively increasing the level of risk and why did I have a risk score of 0.27 BEFORE I placed my first trade during calibration? Surely it should start at 1 and then adjust. My third issue is that I have now been excluded from the september allocation due to a seemingly random correlation with another, and significantly less well performing, darwin. My current index score is 82.65 but no allocation is due. The balance on the MT5 account is currently showing 242664 USD. I know this is a demo account but that equates to a "profit" of 140K in 5 months. My current performance fee estimate is 112 euros to possibly be paid in December. Ummm, I've worked hard during this account but I'll let readers make their own mind up whether these efforts are actually being rewarded. Sorry, Darwinex people but I'll be leaving you shortly unless you resolve your issues esp the correlation one which appears totally random. I accept your performance fees are 15% of profits set against capital. What is not advertised is that that figure is multiplied by risk in my case 0.09. This is a great way of paying for coffee beans.

Non sono sodisfatto, blocchi del conto continui se tradì simile ad altri di cui non hai minimamente idea di chi siano.

con Darwinex Zero ho scoperto un nuovo mondo di fare Prop Trading.

azienda seria, con un servizio clienti molto puntale e chiaro.

bellissima esperienza, la consiglio!!!

I entered a short FDAX position on 16.09.25 at 23,880 with a stop-loss at 23,959 and a take-profit at 23,642. Overnight, the trade was stopped out at 23,987 due to what DarwinZero described as a price spike. However, when I checked the actual EUREX futures data—which DarwinZero claims to use—there was no such spike. The market never came close to my stop-loss level.

When I raised this issue, DarwinZero offered an implausible explanation, referencing “tick aggregation.” But the discrepancy was massive, far beyond any explanation of aggregation or spread. I hold verifiable exchange data, and it simply does not reflect what they executed on my account.

This was not an isolated incident. The same thing occurred on a long position in natural gas (NG). Again, the CME futures data shows no spike, no gap, and no justification for my stop being triggered.

At this point, I strongly doubt DarwinZero is feeding clients genuine exchange data. Despite paying for “authentic futures exchange data,” my trades did not reflect it. Either they were not providing me the data I paid for, or they were executing against something entirely different.

I demanded a full refund of all fees paid to date. After some firm exchanges, DarwinZero relented and refunded me. This is the only reason I did not escalate this matter to the FCA, the Financial Ombudsman, and the exchanges (CME and EUREX). I still hold all logs, statements, and data, and if DarwinZero attempts to rebut this review, I will escalate with my evidence.

I have since closed my account and will not return. In trading, trust in the data feed and execution is non-negotiable—and in my experience, DarwinZero failed to provide that.

"At the opening and closing of the market such gaps are frequent and in no case do we earn at Zero with the loss of our clients trading virtual capital."

IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE: Darwin Zero generates income through monthly SUB + FUTURES DATA fees, with costs stemming from monthly payouts to some traders. Manipulating "so-called CME futures data" can damage a track record, leading some traders to restart their accounts during the calibration phase, resulting in additional fee income. It can also prevent certain traders from qualifying for payouts. While I’m not accusing you of engaging in such practices (boosting fee via spike), I want to highlight that incentives exist for spiking data, even on virtual accounts.

As I have written the spike did not actually occur on the CME exchange's instrument.

Es una aplicación excelente. No hay nada igual actualmente, los cobros de ganancias, son rápidos y sin problema. La recomiendo al 100%.