Al Jazeera English Recenzje 

I follow the news on US-Israel war on Iran. A few times the name "Arabian Golf" came up when talking about the Persian Gulf. I haven't managed to contact Al Jazeera thought their contact page, it doesn't seem to work. I am hoping they are being biased and these mistake are simply made by sleepy editors!

That is the only broadcaster that does truthful report if "unleasant" events, like wars for example. I can only say a big "thank you" to Al Jazeera, and your killed reporters are Real Heros!!!

I used to look forward to unbiased news from al jazeera till only recently, every 5 mins an ad will pop up!! So annoying al jazzera. Stop trying to cream on revenue from YouTube please. I will turn elsewhere if you dont listen and I guarantee you.... many more will leave !!

Aljazeera keeps on inviting general Matt and the other day invited me heink the deputy sectary of defence. It's so funny coz these guys are called and are not asked rough questions and they keep on lying about there country and their government which is understandable . But when they deny facts the interviewer must tell them it's not a fact . Every body in the world understand now that trump is a liar as why to give more coverage to their lies.peiple in know have ditched CNN AND BBC just because of their biased opinions.aljazeera though slowly but going to the same direction . If they want people to stick to their channel they should do tough interviews when inviting the Americans ,in a way they think 10 times before coming to speak lies on AIR

There is no -10 rating here. Otherwise such corrupt channels must be totally out from this earth.
Al Jazeera has often been criticized for displaying selective outrage and double standards in its reporting. Many countries across the world regularly enforce immigration laws, deport illegal migrants, and secure their borders as part of their sovereign responsibilities. However, Al Jazeera frequently portrays such actions primarily through a human-rights lens, while appearing less willing to acknowledge the legitimate security, economic, and legal concerns that governments face.

Critics argue that this creates an impression of biased reporting, where similar actions are judged differently depending on the country, political context, or community involved. Instead of presenting a balanced analysis that includes both humanitarian concerns and the rule of law, Al Jazeera is often accused of emphasizing narratives that align with its editorial preferences.

A responsible news organization should apply the same standards consistently to all countries and all groups. When reporting appears selective or one-sided, it raises legitimate questions about credibility, objectivity, and journalistic integrity. Many viewers therefore view Al Jazeera's coverage of immigration and border-enforcement issues as reflecting an ideological agenda rather than impartial journalism.

Terrorists supporters.
What a waste.

Banned by Nations, Driven by Agenda: The Facts You Are Not Being Told

Before you click another Al Jazeera link, ask yourself one question: Why has this single "news" organization been systematically banned, raided, or completely expelled by numerous sovereign governments across the globe?

Let’s be entirely clear: no legitimate, objective media outlet in the world carries a track record this radioactive. This isn't a matter of subjective political bias or taking sides in a conflict. It is a matter of documented international national security. Governments have repeatedly forced them out for manufacturing dangerous narratives, broadcasting outright fabrication, and allegedly harboring personnel tied to hostile actors. That is not journalism—it is an undeniable, historic red flag.

If you think this is a rant, don't take my word for it. Look it up. The facts are a simple search away, and they are damning.

The structural reality is hiding in plain sight. While the network wraps itself in the sophisticated, high-definition aesthetic of Western journalism, it is a state-owned entity entirely funded by the Qatari Royal Family. True journalism reports the facts and lets the reader decide. Al Jazeera does the opposite: it aggressively embeds pre-determined political conclusions directly into its daily vocabulary to dictate how you think, rather than informing you of what happened.

When a network's editorial line consistently mirrors the highly controversial foreign policy and specific sanctuary-providing agendas of its royal state owners, the line between reporting and political messaging entirely disappears.
I am completely neutral on the regional conflicts they cover, but I am fiercely opposed to narrative manipulation masquerading as objective truth. I refuse to click on Al Jazeera links or contribute to their metrics.

Do your own research, look past the professional graphics, and verify the history for yourself. Make an informed choice about who is funding the information you consume.

Propaganda channel. Lot of cooked up stories for building narrative.

..when I lived in the Arabian Gulf states for many years I used Aljazeera as a reliable platform of news media and even now after 12 years in New Zealand have relied on them... HOWEVER of late they seem to have become more aligned with American news style so now I get my news from other media.

Very up to date and independent news! And only little advertisement brakes.

I always thought it would be a totally biased coverage against the western position. But I have to say that having now watched it a lot during the current conflict I am really impressed about not only their coverage but the balance of it. It has been the best coverage I have seen from any channel. I realise that when they have someone based in Tehran that the response is likely to be more positive towards Iran or less critical...but can you blame them.
Really impressed and has now become one of my go to news channels.

No longer able to tolerate the BBC/RTE and their inability to report objectively without fear or favour, particularly when it relates to the current US and Israeli regimes. Recently switched to Al Jazeera and find it balanced and informative, respectful but not afraid to report factually and to show the devastating outcomes for the most vulnerable.

Al Jazera owen by king . so imagine how they are restricted by many means .

Iran is currently having a massive internet blackout with way worse things happening in the dark of the country. I usually went to Al Jazeera to get the latest and most accurate news about the middle east. Turns out Al Jazeera is heavily state sponsored and barely covers the atrocities happening in Iran... Very disappointed and very dishonest of them: "To be fearless in the pursuit of truth and to be the voice for the voiceless."(network aljazeera, page: /en/about-us#page-36).

They are in favor of the massacre happening, scared to lose their state sponsoring. SHAME

Following news around the Iranian situation and Al Jazeera is clearly biased to support the Iranian government opinions.

Excellent news channel addressing global issues wars, conflict's, political and investigative journalism.. most reliable and unbiased..AJ journalist , reporters and analysts have high standards, highly professional with high moral and ethical standards.. I live in England and I have stopped watching BBC and Sky news, unfortunately very obviously biased , politicised, spreading Israeli propaganda , dishonest unprofessionals, no moral or ethical standards false reporting.

I heard of Al Jazeera, for the first time,
about 30 years ago as a most sought after newspaper by well educated Saudis. Since that time I believe and trust this news channel.
Without these dedicated journalists, the World will be hearing just monopolised, manipulated news.

sometimes the scenes i see here are wow...very shocking to me

Very biased towards one agenda, they continuously spread misinformation or alter just enough to not lie, but will still be able to project their agenda

Propoganda news
Hide radical Islamist and nation.
Shows Hypocrisy and double standard with particular nations.